STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN GIANT SEA WALL JAKARTA SEBAGAI INFRASTRUKTUR PERTAHANAN MARITIM STRATEGIS GUNA MEMPERKUAT KEAMANAN WILAYAH IBU KOTA

Authors

  • Sunu Tri Yuana Sekolah Staf dan Komando Angkatan Laut Jakarta
  • Bagus Jatmiko Sekolah Staf dan Komando Angkatan Laut Jakarta
  • Elisabeth Tanti Sekolah Staf dan Komando Angkatan Laut Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63754/jcn.v4i2.193

Keywords:

Jakarta Giant Sea Wall, maritime defense, maritime critical infrastructure, securitization, command and control, cybersecurity.

Abstract

The Jakarta Giant Sea Wall has primarily been debated as an instrument for coastal flood control and adaptation to sea-level rise. While this perspective remains important, it does not fully capture the strategic value of coastal infrastructure situated within an area that supports ports, logistics, energy, communications, transportation, public services, and governmental functions. This article aims to formulate a strategy for developing the Jakarta Giant Sea Wall as strategic civil infrastructure that supports maritime defense without leading to the militarization of the project. The study employs a qualitative approach through a narrative-conceptual literature review, synthesizing scholarship on the securitization of coastal defense, maritime critical infrastructure protection, infrastructure resilience, physical security against asymmetric threats, multi-agency command and control, and maritime cybersecurity. The analysis demonstrates that the defense value of the Giant Sea Wall lies not merely in its capacity to withstand hydrometeorological hazards, but also in its potential to become part of a layered protection architecture that safeguards the continuity of strategic functions, supports maritime situational awareness, strengthens inter-agency coordination, and enhances the resilience of digital control systems. This article develops a revised Integrated Maritime Defense Infrastructure Framework (IMDIF) consisting of five layers: the threat spectrum; physical and operational protection; continuity of critical functions; command, control, and information integration; and cyber and institutional resilience. The framework conceptualizes the Giant Sea Wall as dual-use strategic infrastructure whose primary function remains civilian, while its design, governance, and preparedness can provide additional value for maritime defense and the security of the Jakarta metropolitan area.

References

Cichocki, R., & Wójcik, P. (2025). Cybersecurity in maritime transport systems: Threats, trends, and countermeasures in the last decade. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 19(3), 715–722. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.19.03.03

Garschagen, M., Surtiari, G. A. K., & Harb, M. (2018). Is Jakarta’s new flood risk reduction strategy transformational? Sustainability, 10(8), 2934. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082934

Giraud, M.-A., Alhadef, B., Guarnieri, F., Napoli, A., Bottala-Gambetta, M., Chaumartin, D., Philips, M., Morel, M., Imbert, C., Itcia, E., Bonacci, D., & Michel, P. (2011). SARGOS: Securing offshore infrastructures through a global alert and graded response system. MAST Europe 2011 – Maritime System and Technology, 7th Global Conference & Exhibition, Marseille, France. HAL-00660219.

Kiciński, R., Jurczak, W., & Jabłońska, M. (2019). Technical aspect concerning vessels halt safety upon terrorist hazard. Journal of KONBiN, 49(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.2478/jok-2019-0030

Lievonne, M. C., Timur, F. G. C., & Hadianto, M. (2025). Securitization of coastal defense in the Delta Works projects: Lesson learned for Indonesia. KEMUDI: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 9(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.31629/kemudi.v9i2.7072

Little, R. G. (2002). Controlling cascading failure: Understanding the vulnerabilities of interconnected infrastructures. Journal of Urban Technology, 9(1), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/106307302317379855

Morris, L. (2020). Stakeholder collaboration as a pathway to climate adaptation at coastal ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(7), 953–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1729435

Ninkovic, V. (2021). Critical infrastructure resilience: National approaches in the United States of America, the United Kingdom and Australia. Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta, Novi Sad. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns55-30333

Nurhidayah, L., Davies, P., Alam, S., Saintilan, N., & Triyanti, A. (2022). Responding to sea level rise: Challenges and opportunities to govern coastal adaptation strategies in Indonesia. Maritime Studies, 21, 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-022-00274-1

Takagi, H., Fujii, D., Esteban, M., & Yi, X. (2017). Effectiveness and limitation of coastal dykes in Jakarta: The need for prioritizing actions against land subsidence. Sustainability, 9(4), 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040619

Watts, R. B. (2005). Maritime critical infrastructure protection: Multi-agency command and control in an asymmetric environment. Homeland Security Affairs, 1(2), Article 3.

Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2026

How to Cite

Yuana, S. T., Jatmiko, B., & Tanti, E. (2026). STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN GIANT SEA WALL JAKARTA SEBAGAI INFRASTRUKTUR PERTAHANAN MARITIM STRATEGIS GUNA MEMPERKUAT KEAMANAN WILAYAH IBU KOTA . Jurnal Cinta Nusantara, 4(2), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.63754/jcn.v4i2.193