POLITICAL HEGEMONY AND THE EMERGENCE OF A SINGLE CANDIDATE IN THE 2024 NORTH ACEH LOCAL ELECTION: A GRAMSCIAN PERSPECTIVE

Sudirman Sudirman; Sahruddin Lubis; TB Massa Dja’far; Safrizal Rambe; Alfa Khalil Ikram

doi:10.63754/jcn.v4i3.179

Authors

Sudirman Sudirman Universitas Nasional Jakarta
Sahruddin Lubis Universitas Nasional Jakarta
TB Massa Dja’far Universitas Nasional Jakarta
Safrizal Rambe Universitas Nasional Jakarta
Alfa Khalil Ikram Universitas Nasional Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63754/jcn.v4i3.179

Keywords:

Political Hegemony, Single-Candidate Election, Aceh Party, Electoral Consensus, Gramsci, Post-Conflict Aceh

Abstract

The increasing occurrence of single-candidate local elections in Indonesia raises important questions about the quality of local democracy, particularly in post-conflict regions such as Aceh. While previous studies mainly explain this phenomenon through institutional factors, they pay limited attention to how political dominance acquires social legitimacy. This study examines how the political hegemony of the Aceh Party generated elite consensus and produced a single-candidate election in the 2024 North Aceh local election. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews and documentary analysis, then analyzed thematically and interpreted through Antonio Gramsci's theory of hegemony. The findings show that the single-candidate election resulted not from institutional arrangements or political pragmatism alone, but from a gradual process of hegemonic consolidation involving historical legitimacy, ideological leadership, elite accommodation, and the production of social consent—mechanisms that transformed political dominance into electoral consensus while formally preserving democratic procedures. This study extends Gramscian theory by showing that hegemonic political practices may develop within formally democratic systems through legitimacy and voluntary consent rather than coercion, contributing to the literature on political hegemony, dominant-party politics, and local democracy in post-conflict societies.

References

Abbink, J. (2017). Paradoxes of electoral authoritarianism: the 2015 Ethiopian elections as hegemonic performance. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 35(3), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2017.1324620

Amundsen, I. (2016). Democratic dynasties? Internal party democracy in Bangladesh. Party Politics, 22(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813511378

Aspinal, E. (2020). Aceh, Islam, and Indonesia. In Islam and Nation (pp. 18–48). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804776271-004

Ayodele, A. A., Musekiwa, T., & Oyedeji, J. K. (2026). Patronage Politicking in Africa: A Scoping Review of Emerging Issues of Clientelism and Prebendalism in South Africa, Nigeria and Zimbabwe. Afrika Focus, 39(1), 149–194. https://doi.org/10.1163/2031356x-20260101

Budiatri, A. P. (2022). The Impact of Local Parties on Party System Institutionalisation in Post-Conflict Aceh. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 41(1), 34–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211029035

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Croke, K. (2017). Tools of single party hegemony in Tanzania: evidence from surveys and survey experiments. Democratization, 24(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1146696

Crouch, H. (2010). Resolving the separatist challenge in Aceh. In Political Reform in Indonesia after Soeharto (pp. 279–330). ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812309211-009

Duile, T. (2021). Challenging Hegemony: Nurhadi-Aldo and the 2019 Election in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 51(4), 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2020.1748896

Gomez, E. T. (2016). Resisting the Fall: The Single Dominant Party, Policies and Elections in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(4), 570–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1192214

Gramsci, A. (2020). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. In On Violence: A Reader (pp. 159–179). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822390169-020

Ingham, S. (2022). Representative Democracy and Social Equality. American Political Science Review, 116(2), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542100109X

KIP Aceh Utara. (2024). Keputusan Komisi Independen Pemilihan Kabupaten Aceh Utara tentang Penetapan Pasangan Calon Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Aceh Utara dalam Pemilihan Tahun 2024.

KPU RI. (2025). Laporan Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Serentak Tahun 2024.

Mietzner, M. (2020). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1704266

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis, A methods sourcebook (fourth). Arizona State University.

Muhammad, H. A., Elsi, S. D., Pratiwi, C. S., Nasuhaidi, N., & Sutan, A. J. (2026). Political Party Endorsement in Supporting the Sole Candidate Muhammad Fadhil Arief and H. Bakhtiar in the 2024 Simultaneous Regional Election of Batanghari Regency. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 4(2), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i2.839

Mukhrijal, M., Rassanjani, S., Herizal, H., & Afrijal, A. (2021). The Winning of the Partai Aceh in a Psychological Political Approach. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 8(2), PROOFREAD. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v8i2.11586

Oyugi, S. O. (2024). The Role of electoral Competition in ethnic Conflict: A comparative Analysis of Kenya and Tanzania. McGill University (Canada).

Palmer, B. (2010). Services Rendered: Peace, Patronage and Post-conflict Elections in Aceh. In Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia (pp. 286–306). ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814279918-019

Prianto, A. L., & Yuslaini, N. (2024). How local democratic backsliding? Single candidate, pragmatism and uncompetitive local head election in Indonesia. JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik), 9(2), 8.

Rohman, S., Napang, M., & Puspitasari, P. (2022). Degradation of democracy with the existence of a single candidate for regional head elections in Indonesia. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 35(2), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V35I22022.160-169

Safa’at, M. A. (2022). Single candidates: Ensuring a path to victory in local elections. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(4), 1163–1176. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911211062485

Simon, R., & Hall, S. (2002). Gramsci’s political thought. Lawrence & Wishart.

Thomas, P. (2009). The Gramscian moment: philosophy, hegemony and Marxism (Vol. 24). Brill.

Trantidis, A. (2022). Building an authoritarian regime: Strategies for autocratisation and resistance in Belarus and Slovakia. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24(1), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120978964

Wessels, B., & Schmitt, H. (2008). Meaningful choices, political supply, and institutional effectiveness. Electoral Studies, 27(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.010