REKONSEPTUALISASI KATA “INSYAALLAH” DALAM INTERAKSI DIGITAL : PERSPEKTIF LINGUISTIK KOGNITIF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63754/jcn.v4i2.151Keywords:
rekonseptualisasi, insyaallah, interaksi digital, linguistik kognitifAbstract
The changing context of digital communication has influenced how speakers construct meaning, including the use of the word insyaallah, which has shifted from its theological meaning toward a socio-pragmatic one. This study aims to analyze the reconceptualization of the meaning of insyaallah in digital interactions using the Cognitive Linguistics perspective within Langacker’s Cognitive Grammar framework. A qualitative approach was employed by analyzing usage contexts, interlocutors’ responses, and the conceptual elements underlying meaning construction. The findings reveal that insyaallah no longer solely represents submission to God's will and a strong commitment, but is more frequently used to express uncertainty, possibility, or a strategy for reducing commitment in social interaction. This semantic shift reflects changes in the collective mental model shaped by repeated digital communication practices. The study concludes that the meaning of insyaallah is dynamic, continuously reconstructed through communicative practices, and influenced by the changing media and social contexts of language use.
Keywords: reconceptualization, insyaallah, digital interaction, cognitive linguistics.
References
Arimi, Sailal. (2015). Linguistik Kognitif: Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: A.Com Press.
Aryadoust, V. (2019). An Integrated Cognitive Theory of Comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 33(2), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2017.1397519
Bader, Y. F. & Obeidat, H. H. (2020). The Language of Facebook Comments on Political Articles in Jordan. International Journal of Linguistics, 12(6), 180–205. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v12i6.18113
Baicchi, A., & Broccias, C. (Eds.). (2024). Constructional and cognitive explorations of contrastive linguistics. Springer Nature.
Baron, N. S. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford University Press.
Bogdan, Robert, & Taylor, Steven J. (2002). Kualitatif Dasar-Dasar Penelitian. Surabaya: Penerbit Usaha Nasional Iting, A., Yusuf, M., & Haddade, H. (2025). Al Tawakkal dalam Al Qur'an. Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam, 6(1), 1–15. DOI: 10.55623/au.v6i1.380
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan D. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cabmbridge University Press
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Djajasudarma, F. (2010). Metode Linguistik: Ancangan Metode Penelitian dan Kajian. Rafika Aditama.
Eckert, P. (2018). Meaning and linguistic variation: The third wave in sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Ergashaliyevna, K. S. (2025). Theoretical foundations of language change and digital communications. Advances in Science and Education, 1(01), 34–36.
Evans, V and Green, M. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics an Introduction. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.
Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford University Press.
Guo, J. (2020). Application of Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics in College English Reading Teaching. 2nd International Education Technology and Research Conference (IETRC 2020), 100–103. https://doi.org/10.25236/ietrc.2020.022
Kiseleva, S. & Trofimova, N. (2017). Metaphor as a Device for Understanding Cognitive Concepts. Revista de Lenguas Para Fines Específicos, 23(2), 226–246. https://doi.org/10.20420/rlfe.2017.344
Lakoff, G. (2016). Language and Emotion. Emotion Review, 8(3), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/-1754073915595097
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (2000). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.
Maizar, A. A. & Saihoob, A. A. A. (2021). Linguistic Developments from The Perspective of The Modern Linguistic Lesson. Ilkogretim Online, 20(3), 1320–1326. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.03.148
Musyayyab, I. & Arimi, S. (2020). Perspektif dan Frame Ekspresi Permintaan Maaf dalam Diskusi Indonesian Lawyers Club “50 Tahun G30S/PKI, Perlukah Negara Minta Maaf?”: Kajian Linguistik Kognitif. Jurnal Bastrindo Kajian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.29303/jb.v1i2.48
Putra, D. S. A., & Selohadi, L. S. M. (2022). Tinjauan atas Relasi Bahasa dan Pikiran serta Implikasinya Terhadap Penerapan Teori Metafora Konseptual. Metafora: Jurnal Lintas Disiplin Studi Metafora, 1(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.26877/mf.v1i1.10694
Sajjad, F., Malghnai, M. & Khosa, D. (2018). Language, Social Media and Political Identity (Re)presentation: A New Theoretical Framework for the Analysis of Social Media Political Discourse. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n2p199
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and Social Cognitive Theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Seargeant, P., & Tagg, C. (2014). The language of social media: Identity and community on the Internet. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Sanata Dharma University Press.
Tagg, C. (2012). The discourse of text messaging: Analysis of SMS communication. Continuum.
Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford University Press.
Tuggy, D. (2009). The affix-stem distinction: A Cognitive Grammar analysis of data from Orizaba Nahuatl. Cognitive Linguistics, 3(3), 237–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1992.3.3.237
Verspoor, M. H. (2017). Cognitive Linguistics and Its Applications to Second Language Teaching BT - Language Awareness and Multilingualism (J. Cenoz, D. Gorter, & S. May (eds.); pp. 55–66). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02240-6_4
Wijana, I Dewa Putu. (2010). Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Xiao, R. (2017). Combining Transformative Generative Grammar and Systemic Functional Grammar: Linguistic Competence, Syntax and Second Language Acquisition. International Journal of English and Literature, 8(4), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEL2017.1050
Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. Continuum.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nuramila Nuramila, Argariawan Tamsil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
